As the Chief Architect for Identity Management and Lead
Security Architect for On Demand Security Infrastructure and Technical Strategy
at IBM, Nataraj Nagartnam has
witnessed firsthand the maturation of Grid security technologies – both in the
research world and the commercial /
enterprise world. In a recent interview
with the Globus Consortium Journal, Nagaratnam brings readers up to speed on
the CredEx Project,
and outlines some specific security challenges that the Grid community is
working hard to address today.
Nagaratnam: CredEx is
an open source, standards-based Web Service that facilitates the secure storage
of credentials and enables the dynamic exchange of different credential types
using the WS-Trust
token exchange protocol.
Nagaratnam: You can view CredEx as more of a
credential exchange mechanism on the server side, and aligned with MyProxy. As
a matter of fact, the design and implementation of CredEx is inspired by MyProxy, the critical
differences being that CredEx supports more than just the password-to-Grid
Credential (GSI) exchange and that CredEx is compliant with emerging Web
Services security specifications and standards, specifically WS-Trust.
Nagaratnam: Digital
Identity is an online representation of users, groups, organization and devices
and maybe used in transactions, collaborative computing and social networking. Given
the multiple identity systems that participate in everyday online activities –
transactions, collaboration, sharing – across companies, governments and social
networks, an identity framework is necessary so that identity information can
be federated across multiple identity systems.
And as you probably saw earlier this week, IBM and Novell jointly announced
an open source initiative for building an online, user-centric identity management
system.
When you consider threats like identity theft and phishing -
and the new security implications of social networking and collaborative
computing - there's a lot of identity information out there today, managed by
different systems and institutions. From
an end user perspective, we are concerned about identity being lost or accessed
by a non-trusted party. And from
companies' perspectives, they're worried about reputation.
So user-centric identity management is the next big wave in
Internet security. It allows end users
to actively manage their identity information. This is also about making multiple identity systems and policies
interoperable. So we're looking at open
source as a foundation so that a community of developers can work with user-centric
identity, and no one gets locked into a proprietary system.
This Higgins Trust Framework can
integrate with open LDAP, or IBM's
directory server, or Novell's directory server, or Active Directory. And the identity information isn't only in
LDAP directories -- it can be in human resources systems, like People Soft,
from an enterprise standpoint. Or even
on my cell phone, maybe I want to integrate my buddy list with my Yahoo or
LinkedIn.
So we're looking at an identity meta system that can be
built on open standards and open source, where other multiple identity systems
can be plugged in -- an identity infrastructure for the Internet.
GCJ: One of the discussions taking place around application development is people
favoring the “P” languages (Perl, Python, PHP) for certain application
development requirements. Do you see any sort of acceleration in the use of the “P” languages in Grid computing?
Nagaratnam: There is definitely a lot of interest in PHP and the entire LAMP area, and IBM does work in those areas as well with our
products like Geronimo
and even WebSphere. Also, we are moving to a service component architecture which allows us to
assemble services where each service may be implemented in a manner that is
familiar to that person. But it is not really a J2EE replacement discussion.
But from an enterprise application viewpoint (business logic
and access to business data), I think J2EE platforms still will continue. And
if certain applications are written in Java or PHP, they should be accessible
through a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) and thus in a language-agnostic
way.
GCJ: Can you give us a quick update on where you perceive to be the vulnerabilities for Grid security today … the areas that perhaps have not been perfected on the security front that require some additional work in the next couple years?
Nagaratnam: The
traditional security needs around authentication, and authorization have been
addressed quite well, and have enough focus. The aspect of delegation is
starting to be addressed in some discussions in the security community, and
there is more to be done there. With increasing regulation controls and
compliance needs, the need for audit becomes more important.
With respect to the vulnerabilities, I think the aspect of
isolation continues to be challenging, be it in Grid environment i.e., distributed
computing environment. We continue to
work on isolating application data and identity where multiple identities
access the same application. For example, if you have multiple applications on
the same middleware, but are accessing different data sources, you don’t want
the data to be accessed -- even accidentally -- by the other one. Isolation is
really key.
Today, much of the isolation is definitely at the process
level. In fact, most of the practical deployments are not only at the process
level, but maybe at the physical box level. But when it comes to process level
isolation, then there are a lot of control and capabilities and platform
considerations (like the OS) that come into play. How do you isolate the same
job or multiple jobs running across all different organizations or entities?
close window |